Is Medical Education Oppressive? Expert Failure, Social Media & Other Lessons from AAMC 2010

15 11 2010

I spent the majority of last week at the Association of American Medical Colleges.  This was my first time attending the majority of the meeting and it did not disappoint.  While there is lore that some authors are not good speakers, this was definitely not the case with Malcolm Gladwell. Using vignettes ranging from the Civil War to the downfall of Bears Stern and recent financial crisis, he eloquently described what happens when ‘experts’ fail.  Experts fail due to miscalibration, not incompetence.  Miscalibration results from overconfidence when one perceives they have perfect information.  This is certainly true in medicine, in which overconfidence can lead to diagnostic error through early closure.  

While I was still mulling over expert failure, I attended a very interesting session titled “Flexner, Freedom, and the Way Forward” delivered by Steve Kanter, editor of Academic Medicine and Dean of the University of Pittsburgh. Drawing from the educational pedagogy of Brazilian Paulo Freire, he articulated the need to go from the traditional medical education that is fundamentally oppressive, inhibits critical thinking, and rewards conformity to one that promotes intellectual inquiry, the freedom to explore ideas, and imagination.  Unfortunately, the current “deficit” model focuses on students as the major problem, as opposed to environment or instructional practices, and is characterized by the famous “P=MD” promulgated in medical schools today. The increasing emphasis on student unprofessionalism, with little attention on altering the environment or examining the role models – positive or negative- that students interact with is another example of the deficit model. 

So, how do we move to a generative model, which encourages more imagination, creativity, and freedom?  Interestingly, one of Kanter’s answers was through the cultivation of scholarly projects, something that he has championed at the University of Pittsburgh.  This was particularly interesting given the explosive growth in schools that now offer scholarly concentrations, including our own.   During an early morning breakfast meeting of schools with ‘scholarly concentrations’,  I wondered if we would reach a Gladwell ‘a tipping point’ where medical school ‘majors’ would become commonplace or whether these would remain a niche for select schools.   

In addition to thinking about how to move forward, it’s also important to think about how we ended up with this model if it is not desirable?  Is it possible that expert medical educators failed to recognize the importance of critical thinking?  Well, a more plausible explanation is conformity is actually desirable.  After all, few patients are looking for ‘creative imaginative doctors’ (often synonymous with quackery).  Instead, doctors are rewarded for ‘standard of care’ and following ‘evidence-based standards.’  Although creativity and imagination are not rewarded in medical practice, it is certainly needed in medical education.  On this centennial of the Flexner report, there were plenty of reminders at AAMC that we still have the same problems that plagued medical educators 100 years ago.  Reasons for lack of progress in this area include inertia, lack of funding, and the perverse incentives academic health centers that detract from the teaching mission. 

But, this begs the question, is medical education ready for creativity and freedom?   Interestingly, while the “mHealth” or mobile health summit was showcasing the latest technological innovations and advances just down the road in DC, AAMC sessions on social media and medical education focused on the fears associated with increasing use of social media among medical trainees.  When full-scale institutional bans were mentioned, students highlighted how this may inadvertently result in a backlash, popularizing these technologies or the creation of an underground.  In the words of one student (per @MotherInMedicine) “You trust us to care for patients, but not to post on Facebook.” Interestingly, medical educators weren’t the only group thinking about social media and professionalism.  At the same time, the AMA issued its new guidelines for social media, aimed at helping physicians cultivate a positive professional online presence without jeopardizing the doctor-patient relationship.  While social media use in medical education continues to be debated, the meeting was a powerful reminder that we need to consider the future practice of medicine in training the physicians of tomorrow.  While we cannot ‘see’ exactly what the future holds, ignoring it entirely would certainly be oppressive and an expert failure.

–Vineet Arora, MD

About these ads

Actions

Information

6 responses

15 11 2010
Joe Ferraro

I feel as a current medical student in MS1 that there really isn’t much breathing room for creativity due to the amount of material presented and also that the type of people attracted to medical school for the most part aren’t creative thinkers. In MS1 – MS2 the amount of didactic knowledge required to be memorized and applied is enormous, with most of every waking moment spent mastering it leaving little room for a student to think of anything else outside of it. As for the type of people typically found in a medical school classroom, many of them have been studying the cold hard facts of science endlessly for years in pursuit of getting admitted to medical school. Creative thinking as it’s being described here is cultivated by not only studying the sciences but in the liberal arts as well, forcing linear thought models to become more global and multi-dimensional. Thats my poorly written two scents on it anyway.

15 11 2010
clcraig

gladwell took numerous liberties with actual civil war history. perhaps the biggest that robert e lee made a “miscalibration” invading the North resulting in Gettysburg. To make a long story short, both Lee and President Stephen Davis knew the odds were long, but time and resources were running out on the Confederacy, and a bold gamble was needed as a last ditch effort. If Gladwell writes this up for publication later, he would do well to recheck his sources or perhaps have a sit down with James McPherson at Yale or Shelby Foote (North Carolina).

15 11 2010
Jared Solomon

If medical education were ready to reward creativity and freedom, I would already have a residency position.

15 11 2010
David Mends

I school in West Africa where the word of the consultant or resident is the law and creativity is definitely frowned upon. in fact, answering questions using the EXACT SAME WORDS as your consultant is the surest path to graduation.

14 01 2013
Cultivating Creativity in Medical Training FedEx Style « FutureDocs

[...] have their spirit squashed during traditional medical training.   I am not alone.  I have seen experts argue the need to go from the traditional medical education that is fundamentally oppressive, inhibits [...]

3 09 2013
Cultivating Creativity in Medical Training FedEx Style - The Almost Doctor's Channel

[…] have their spirit squashed during traditional medical training.   I am not alone.  I have seen experts argue the need to go from the traditional medical education that is fundamentally oppressive, inhibits […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 16,208 other followers

%d bloggers like this: