How Technology is Changing Medical Education: Match and Residency Training

20 03 2011

This past week was the biggest week in medical education, which culminates in the Residency Match.   It also marked the swsx festival in Austin, featuring the best of technology and entertainment.  So this post is dedicated to commemorating these two seemingly unrelated yet simultaneous events.  The generation that matched are the doctors of the future who are extreme technophiles and not afraid to use it in medicine.  They may even make their career decisions based on them.  On the interview trail, they will often ask whether the program has an electronic health record.   So, as senior students embark into their residency, it seems only fitting to explore how technology is changing medical education.  Since there is a lot to say, I’ll write a follow up on how it is affecting preclinical education but the focus is on the match and residency training here.

Technology and the Match   During the 2011 residency match, social media was in full force, and the internet was atweeting as medical students, schools, and educators were espousing the #MatchDay and #MatchDay2011 hashtags.  Several medical schools actually embraced social media to actively announce where their students were going via Twitter, dedicated blogs, or Flickr (yes Eastern Virgina students wear costumes!).  As students celebrated by announcing where they were going, faculty (including myself) could welcome them into their own program.  Current interns could rejoice that they were that much closer to the end of their grueling internship, except that they were still going to be on call overnight, while the newly matched have restricted duty hours.

Students often wonder about the size and capability of the mega-computer that runs the algorithm that produces the matches.  Unfortunately, this year’s match was marred by a serious computer crash during the precious hours of the Scramble highlighting the worst case scenarios when we depend on technology.  The computer crash also does not bode well for the implementation of next year’s Managed Scramble which will increase the numbers of aspiring residents who will use the Electronic Residency Application Service to apply to programs in the post-Match mayhem that is the Scramble.  In addition, the current debate over the “All -in” plan will require heavier technological capability as international medical graduates will be required to enter the Match (unlike US Seniors, they can accept positions outside of the Match). 

Technology and Residency Training  Technology certainly increases our capability in monitoring resident duty hours and collect evalutions through Learning Management Systems like New Innovations or e-Value.  However, the implementation of electronic health records actually increases time to do work in many cases, which may make it harder to comply with duty hours.  Although decision support can improve quality of care, others worry that overreliance on decision support may result in physicians who subscribe to cookbook medicine and worse, can’t operate without technology.  For example, one program director stated that she was going to resort to a ‘blue book’ exam for residents to demonstrate how to do admission orders using the classic mneumonic ADC VAN DISMAL.

More interestingly, just like email and internet has made it possible to conduct business 24/7, the remote access of electronic health records makes it possible to work from home, after you leave the hospital.  This may come in the form of ‘epicstalking’ as our attendings and residents refer to it – the process of ‘following a patient’ by looking at the labs and studies through virtually logging in to the hospital’s electronic health record “Epic” from home, long after departing the hospital.  Attendings can use epicstalking to ensure that the hospitalized patients are receiving the therapies that are indicated and that the residents are presenting all the information (in essence a form of supervision).  However, residents often epicstalk to try to check to see what is going on with the patient they have handed off and gone home, a time when they should be resting.   With shorter hours, will more work be transferred home?  It is possible, and how this time will be counted in residency duty hours is still anyone’s guess.

In the meantime, maybe a consult to the supersmart Watson can help us tackle these problems? 

Also, stay tuned for part 2 which will look at technology and medical student education.

–Vineet Arora, MD





Love Letters for Medical Students

29 01 2011

While Valentine’s Day is coming soon, a different sort of ‘love letter’ may be sent or received by senior medical students.  As recruitment season draws to a close, residency programs and applicants may be busy exchanging notes of interest, affectionately dubbed “love letters” by scores of medical students and on StudentDoctor.net.  

What do these love letters mean?  Some students have asked us whether it is a Match Violation to get or send a love letter.  Others have worried they did not send enough or what type of language they should use.  Well, here are some quick tips on how to approach this somewhat awkward situation.

  1. Is it a Match Violation? It is not a Match Violation for a program or a student to express interest in the other.  However, these statements of interest cannot be binding (i.e. we will only rank you highly if you rank us #1).  If there is any part of it that is binding, then it would escalate to the level of a Match Violation.  Read more about what constitutes a violation here.   
  2. “Rank highly” vs. “Rank #1”? -  It is poor form to send more than 1 program a “I will rank you #1” note.  There are 2 strategies that most students will use- The first is to select the #1 program to send a “rank #1” letter to and then to send “rank highly” to the next 2-3 programs on the list.  Since some believe that ”rank highly” has become the code for “I love you but not enough,”  the alternative is to be coy and not let any program you will rank them #1, but use language like “I could see myself there” or “I would be honored to train there.”  
  3. “Rank to match” statements from the program – It is possible that programs could call or email to alert you that they are ‘ranking you to match.’  While you may feel elated, this does NOT mean that you should pack up your belongings and move.  This also does NOT mean that you should cut programs from your list since are secured a spot.  What this DOES mean is that they are interested in you and have likely placed you in a position on their rank list where they THINK on an average year you could match there.  Because the Match is very tricky and the competitiveness for an individual program can change year to year, “ranked to match” in one year may mean “out of luck” in another year.  So our advice is to not put a lot of stock into these statements and still preserve the breadth and depth on your list that you will need to secure a position.  Remember the length of your Rank List is one of the best predictors of whether you will match or not. 
  4. What about programs that I don’t send letters to? Will they think I hate them? –Absolutely not.  The letters can serve as a signal in the game that you are interested but just because you don’t send a letter does not mean that you can’t end up at that program.  Programs are maximizing their ability to get the best candidates regardless of this communication.   It would be extremely unusual for a program to strike someone from their list if they don’t receive a letter.  Likewise, if you are not very competitive for a program, your letter is not going to be the dealbreaker to move you in to the rankable range.  Remember, the letter is really a statement of interest that may help a little, but not a lot.
  5. Email vs. Paper – During the recruitment season, paper thank you cards can be a nice touch if sent in a timely fashion.  However, the post-recruitment love letter should probably be an e-mail given the occasional snafu in snail-mail especially in large hospitals.  The nice thing about the email is that it can be immediately forwarded to the members of the recruitment committee or others.  In terms of who to send the love letter to, it is usually sent to the program director unless someone else was clearly the lead recruitment person for the day (an associate program director or a faculty member).  As always, try to personalize the letter to highlight the things you enjoyed about the program that day.   
  6. There is no ‘right’ answer – As with our other career advising posts regarding the Match, there is no right answer here.  Since everyone’s case is different, the best thing may be to consult with a faculty member from your field who has been advising you on the process. 

Alas, in spite of all the love you may get or feel, the irony is that the key to a successful residency match is not to fall in love.   Remember, you are not in a relationship with any program yet.  Since anything is possible, you need to keep an open mind.  Try to group your list in tiers.  Consider that you would be happy at any of the programs in your ‘top tier’  to avoid being dead set on one place.  Visit last year’s archived post if you need more help creating a rank list or checking it twice.  Lastly, don’t forget to certify your list by February 23rd 9pm EST/8pm CST/6pm PST.     

Happy Match List Making!

–Vineet Arora, MD and Shalini Reddy, MD





Blog ‘Paper’ Anniversary: Reflections & Top Posts of 2010

3 01 2011

It’s been one year of blogging or our ‘paper’ anniversary here on FutureDocs! 

I was reminded of this milestone with the receipt of the WordPress blog ‘report card’ below.   While I was excited to learn about the clean bill of health and intrigued by metrics related to shipping containers, I’m not going to lie.   It can be very challenging to stay fresh, write creatively, and keep up with posting while holding down an academic career.          

However, one thing I have learned (and confirmed by @MotherInMed who helped me get started) was that if you are inspired, the post will write itself (like this one).  Therefore, it is critical to pay attention to those moments you are inspired.  This gives rise to a somewhat startling personal observation– blogging can acutally improve your attention span and focus.  Sounds crazy, I know… But, unlike social media sites which can be highly distracting (Twitter or Facebook addicts anyone?), I find that I often pay closer attention to my surroundings so that I don’t miss the inspirational moment around the corner that I can share.   For example, in lieu of walking around aimlessly at medical conferences (a risk at any conference especially in medicine), I found myself taking notes and immediately reflecting on sessions to distill the most salient points, such as the oppressive nature of medical education or expert failure highlighted at the recent Association of American Medical Colleges.

In examining the report card below, the top posts on this blog are both predictable and surprising.  With the explosion of interest in technology and plenty of technophiles in the blogosphere, it is no surprise that posts about Twitter myths for docs and whether the iPad lives up to it’s hype on the wards are at the top.   The other 2 posts relate to career advising, which was a welcome surprise.  They also do reaffirm the need to continue to provide solid career advice to medical trainees, no matter how mundane (like what to wear to the hospital).   In addition to technology and career advising, I’ve enjoyed the ability to highlight various advocacy issues relating to medical education like healthcare reform, resident duty hours, the Match, and women in medicine.  Lastly, I must admit that I do enjoy writing for pure fun – like the posts on movies in medicine or healthcare phobias.   

Special thanks to uber medbloggers KevinMD and medrants who occasionally cross post or reference these posts and all those who subscribe and comment.   I was especially honored to be included in KevinMD’s top 10 posts of the year for this post on shadowing (which curiously did not make the WordPress list below).  

So here’s to more inspirational and informative moments of 2011, both in life and on the blogosphere.

–Vineet Arora, MD

***Blog Report Card From WordPress:

Fortunately, the stats helper monkeys at WordPress.com mulled over how this blog did in 2010, and sent me the following high level summary of its overall blog health:

Healthy blog!

The Blog-Health-o-Meter™ reads Wow.

Crunchy numbers

This blog was viewed about 20,000 times in 2010. If each view were a shipping container, your blog would have filled about 4 fully loaded ships.

In 2010, there were 30 new posts, not bad for the first year!  The busiest day of the year was March 5th with 304 views. The most popular post that day was Top Twitter Myths & Tips.

Where did they come from?

The top referring sites in 2010 were twitter.com, kevinmd.com, Google Reader, medrants.com, and facebook.com.

Attractions in 2010

These are the posts and pages that got the most views in 2010.

Top Twitter Myths & Tips February 2010
6 comments

Attending Rounds with the iPad – Hype or Hindrance? August 2010
13 comments

What Not to Wear: Hospital Edition May 2010
4 comments

Personal Statement Do’s and Don’ts July 2010
4 comments

KM3YKUY2DG5Z








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 9,509 other followers